Asia Morning Briefing: Here is the number of initial AI vs. BTC environmental impacts. And it may start a new discussion



Good morning, Asia. This is what makes news in the market:

Welcome to Asian morning briefings, daily summary of top stories throughout the US time, and an overview of market movements and analysis. For a detailed overview of the US market, see Coindesk’s Crypto Daybook Americas.

Mistral AI recently provided a rare benchmark in environmental disclosures for the artificial intelligence industry, detailing the footsteps of the flagship large-scale language model, the Mistral Large 2.

For more than 18 months, training and manipulation of the model produced comparable emissions of 20.4 ktnnes, consumed 281,000 cubic meters of water and depleted 660 ktl of antimony equivalent material, Mistral’s report states. In particular, a single response of 400 tokens from the chatbot, Le Chat uses only 1.14 grams of CO2, 45 mL of water, and 0.16 milligrams of mineral resources.

But how does this compare to Bitcoin’s carbon footprint? Ultimately, the use of Bitcoin energy is a major debate and is often cited in establishing a ban on Bitcoin mining in jurisdictions.

This makes AI reasoning seem incredibly frugal compared to Bitcoin’s job proof engine. On average, one Bitcoin transaction emits 600-700 kilograms of Co2, consumes more than 17,000 liters of water and produces more than 130 grams of e-waste.

The entire Bitcoin network released around 48 million tonnes of CO2 in 2023, according to the Cambridge Alternative Finance Centre. It also consumed over 2 billion liters of water and produced over 20,000 tons of e-waste.

However, while peer-reviewed, Cambridge Centre figures are a significant source of criticism and require significant warnings.

First of all, Bitcoin’s electric mix is not monolithic.

As of March 2023, a miner survey conducted by BTC investment fund Batcoinz shows that hydroelectric power (23.1%), wind power (13.9%) and solar (5%) collectively account for more than 40% of Bitcoin’s energy consumption. The difference in numbers is because the survey conducted by Batcoinz includes off-grid generation.

Nuclear power, often considered carbon neutral, accounts for an additional 7.9%. Gas and coal represent 44%, while Bitcoin’s energy profile is more diverse than critics often expect.

Second, LLMS may benefit from a cleaner grid by default. For example, nuclear energy consists of more than 22% of the European Union’s generation, reducing CO2 emissions associated with model training and inference in EU-based data centers such as Mistral.

The advantage is grid geography, not due to model architecture. US-based training runs from coal-heavy regions present very different environmental profiles.

Therefore, the marginal footprint of using LLM is much less than processing BTC transactions, but both operate within an infrastructure landscape that forms a significant real environmental impact.

Training frontier models such as the GPT-4 and Gemini can require millions of GPU time and large amounts of water consumption, depending on the location. Still, the design of Bitcoin mining every 10 minutes regardless of demand results in a fixed energy cost that grows over time rather than usage.

In contrast, the marginal cost scale of AI with frequency of use of the model. That distinction makes emissions from chatbots easier to amortize than emissions from block rewards.

As global scrutiny increases at environmental costs of calculations, transparency initiatives like Mistral offer important reference points.

While proof of work is energy intensive, half the mechanisms of the Bitcoin blockchain steadily reduce the speed at which new coins are created, encouraging miners to become more efficient over time. Its environmental footprint should be weighed against the utilities it offers when ensuring a decentralized global financial network.

Continuous improvements in clean energy adoption and mining optimization are important as they expand to the core pillars of the digital economy for both BTC and AI.

Market Movers:

BTC: Bitcoin is trading at $119,500 and has struggled to maintain momentum after last week’s all-time high of $123,100.

ETH: Ether pulled more than 3% back to $3,696 as technical indicators flashed whether the rally could continue without broader revisions despite the ongoing accumulation of institutions, and analysts questioned.

gold: Gold prices rose nearly 1% on Tuesday, with Spot Gold continuing to cut investors’ profits at a five-week high of 3,430.41 amid ongoing trade uncertainty and declining US bond yields.

Nikkei 225: After US President Donald Trump announced a “large deal” with Japan, the Asia-Pacific market opened higher, increasing tariffs by 15% on Japanese exports, and the Nikkei 225 rose 1.71% in the open.

S&P 500: US stocks were mixed on Tuesday, but the S&P 500 was slightly higher to a record 6,309.62 as investors weighed in on the revenue report.

Other locations in the code:

  • Ethereum Valtta exit queue approaches $20 billion when the Stakers rush out after a 160% meeting (Coindesk)
  • Crypto Prediction Market Polymarket launches its own Stablecoin: Source (Coindesk)
  • Tokenized stocks face resistance to letters from the well-known Wall Street company Citadel Securities (block)



Source link